Skip to main content

Left, Right, or Straight_6 Analysis

 

Left, Right, or Straight_6 Analysis

Leg 18 from the ultra-long course of the Norwegian Championship on 12 May 2019 (in class M19-20)

Upon a quick review of the GPS tracks, it appears that the right route falls significantly behind the left route, despite its brief extension and the majority being on a well-maintained road.



This appears to be a cleverly devised trap by the course setter, resulting in a potential loss of at least one minute for those who opted for the seemingly advantageous larger road without considering the challenges of the subsequent section leading to the control point.

Among those with GPS trackers, 9 out of 10 participants opted for the left route.



Let's delve deeper into these two routes and examine the competitors' outcomes more thoroughly.

Leg 18 spans approximately 1700 meters, with KP18 situated 25 meters higher than KP17. This suggests that it was logical for competitors to choose a route that involved less descent to minimize the subsequent climb.

The right route covers 1980 meters, featuring an initially easy stretch on a broad forest road with a descent of 75 meters. However, a steep ascent on a rocky hill follows 65 meters after the road, just before approaching the control point.

The left route is about 2250 meters, mostly on a trail, albeit one on frequently boggy terrain.

In the initial part of this leg, there is a 50-meter descent, followed by a gradual 25-meter climb along the trail, leading to the approach to control 18 without gaining altitude along the slope.


The winner, Kasper Fosser, exhibited superior speed throughout the course and on this particular leg, winning by 54 seconds over the competitor who chose the same route and by 1.31 over the one who took the right-hand route.

However, when comparing Jørgen Baklid's time (the sole participant who took the right route) with competitors of similar running speeds, it becomes evident that the left and right routes yield comparable results.

Analysing the splits of the 3rd and 4th placed competitors on the course (Jørgen Baklid and Sander Arntzen), who had similar overall times and comparable performances on the legs leading to leg 18 ( Particularly noteworthy is their performance on run 10-11, where both took around 12 minutes),  reveals interesting insights. Their time on the leg 18 is roughly equal. 

An intriguing speed statistic emerged at leg 18, showcasing an 18-minute per km hill climb on the right route, a pace three times slower than the section with a gentle climb on the left route.


Kasper Fosser maintained an impressive pace of 4.30 min/km.

Sander Arntzen, finishing in 4th place on the same right-hand route, had a pace of 5.14 min/km.

The second-place runner on the leg and the entire course, Lukas Liland, achieved a pace of 4.48 min/km. However, it seems he didn't execute the route flawlessly and could have narrowed the gap to Kasper on this leg.

sources: http://3drerun.worldofo.com/2d/?lidstr=20190512ultraH1920

http://obasen.orientering.se/winsplits/online/en/default.asp?page=table&databaseId=62449&categoryId=4

Aleksandr Alekseyonok, January 31, 2024

My book on orienteering for advanced athletes

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Left, Right, or Straight: Leg Analysis #13

  Left, Right, or Straight: Leg Analysis #13 Today we will take a close look at the route choice for leg 5-6  from the women's elite long-distance  at the "Närkekvartetten" 3-day event in Sweden (May 11, 2024) The altitude gain on this leg will not have a significant effect on the route choice.  The right-hand route doesn't look bad in the first half, with a fairly large section along the road. However, after the stream (point A), there is difficult navigation with challenging runnability. Therefore, we will abandon this route and choose between the 'direct' and 'left' routes. The straight and left routes are identical up to the midpoint (point B). Therefore, we have ample time on the course to make a decision. Additionally, the alternative of running to point B on the right side of the road (orange track) is not favourable as it involves a longer path compared to the straight route to point B, where there is a long path. Let's look at the differe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Left, Right, or Straight #7

Left, Right, or Straight #7 When I saw leg 4-5, I thought, 'What a not very interesting long leg with an unambiguous route on the right side along the crest of the hill.' However, it turns out that's not actually the case. Many athletes didn't take advantage of this opportunity. Do you think there's an equally viable alternative to the route on the right? source: https://www.livelox.com/Viewer/Costa-Calida-2024-Larga-Caravaca-/M-35A?classId=716564&tab=player Expect a detailed analysis of this leg in a few days. Aleksandr Alekseyonok, March 3, 2024.
Post a Comment
Read more

Left, Right, or Straight: Leg Analysis #9

  Left, Right, or Straight: Leg Analysis #9 Today, we will focus on a detailed analysis of leg 14-15 from the women's long course at 'Spring Spartacus' event in Hungary. I find the route choice for leg 14-15  to be simple and unambiguous.  This perception is supported by the GPS tracks of the competitors. Interestingly, only one competitor from this class took the right-hand route out of all those who loaded their tracks on Livelox. We cannot definitively attribute this deviation to the athlete's error. For many runners, these competitions were part of the training camp for the European Championships 2024. The athlete may have had different objectives than simply completing the course quickly. It's possible that on this leg, she was practicing a challenging technical skill, such as running along a slope. However, based on this iformation, we can assess how effective the right-hand route was.  The leg is 1060 metres long, crossing massive landforms. Therefore, one...
Post a Comment
Read more