Skip to main content

Left, Right, or Straight: Leg Analysis #2

 Left, Right, or Straight: Leg Analysis #2

Routes analiysis of leg 9 of the norwegian M20 test race for JWOC 2017.

Sometimes we can make very wrong assumptions about the terrain's runnability based on the map alone. This is especially common in Scandinavian terrain.

An illustrative example of this is a 1050-meter leg where a 1750-meter route (extending it by 700 meters) proved to be the winning choice over other routes.

So, this leg 9 is from the 2017 M20 qualification race in Norway for the World Junior Championships.

link: https://www.tulospalvelu.fi/gps/20170528langH/



The "Straight" route, expertly executed by Audun Heimdal, measured approximately 1,200 meters and had a time of 9:18.



The best time on the right-side route was achieved by Eirik Langedal Breivik, who completed it in 8:30, which was 48 seconds faster than Heimdal's time. Notably, the length of Breivik's route was over 1,750 meters, making it 45% longer than the "straight" route chosen by Heimdal.

The average pace of the leader on the straight route was 7:42 minutes per kilometer, indicating very challenging running conditions in the forest. It is highly likely that there was dense and difficult-to-run undergrowth vegetation, a situation not uncommon in Norway.

We can also assess that the forest was challenging to navigate based on the choices made by athletes. Out of 20 participants with GPS devices, 14 opted for the right-side route, and 10 of them chose the shortest way to the path available, which involved going significantly to the right from Control 8. The option involving a straight route along the long re-entrant to the road lost a minimum of 30 seconds compared to the longer option.



Notably, even Kasper Fosser chose the shorter route to the path but lost almost one minute here, perhaps due to low runnability. 




The left-side route, which involved using paths, was not optimal due to its significant extension (almost 1700 meters). Additionally, there was considerably less running on the paths compared to the right-side route, and these paths were shallow, which didn't allow for the same speed as the road on the right-side route 



The running pace on the road was 4.36 min/km including the section beetwing two roads in the middle. The total pace on the right-hand route was  4.51 min/km


An important conclusion we can draw from the analysis of this run is that it is crucial to know the pace you can maintain in the 'open' forest and on the trails in a given area in order to make the best route choices. The difference between these two paces depends on the percentage of route lengthening that can be offset by a faster pace on the pathes or roads. 

November 1, 2023. Aleksndr Alekseyonok.

See also my brand New e-book on Orienteering for advanced runners 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

  Case Study #4 Case: You ran onto a narrow ride slightly below its end and are unsure which of several similar rides you are on.   Solution: In this situation, the relief profile can assist us. Even if the rides themselves appear similar, the relief profile along each ride differs , providing valuable clues for accurate positioning. This approach is discussed in Chapter 3 ( Using All the Indicators for Confident Positioning ) of the book Planning Reliable Routes . It demonstrates that relief can be used not only when we are uncertain about our current location , but also proactively during route planning . By analysing the map in advance, we can identify segments where linear features intersect with relief forms , creating distinct and easily recognisable points. These can serve as reliable positioning features . Additionally, flat areas and transitions between slopes and level terrain can also support effective location verification. (Example taken from my book Plann...

New o-book is coming this fall!

  New O-Book Coming This Fall! Confident Orienteering: A Systematic Approach to Minimising Errors Book 1: Fundamentals was released in October 2023 and has already been translated into seven languages , alongside the original English edition. With 8 chapters and 140 pages, it introduced the core concepts of the author's navigation system — and I’m still amazed at how warmly it was received by orienteers around the world. 🌍 As we continued working on the next part of this practical guide, it became clear that the project had grown into something much bigger — not least because of the sheer number of examples and illustrations included throughout (around 250 in total!). To make the material easier to absorb, we’re now leaning towards splitting it into two volumes , each with its own clear focus. This isn’t a final decision yet, and even the titles below are working titles — but right now, this structure feels like the most reader-friendly option: 📖 Book 2 (working title...

Book 2 Nears the Finish Line

  Book 2 Nears the Finish Line Editors Ross Barnett and Clive Allen are now in the final stage of polishing Confident Orienteering Book 2: Planning Reliable Routes . Ross has already done two full read-throughs, which put me on an emotional high – and it’s still going! Clive has started the final proofread before layout. My wife, Svetlana (the book designer), and I are wrapping up the explanatory graphics for the illustrations. The test readers have also finished reading all the chapters. I’ll share their feedback once we start the layout phase. If all goes well, in about two weeks we’ll begin laying out Book 2. The goal is to release it in late September or early October. Fingers crossed everything runs smoothly in these last weeks. Work on Book 3 (Routes executing) is also moving fast. Only two chapters are left – and then the whole Practical Guide  'Confident Orienteering: A Systematic Approach to Minimising Errors' will be complete.  Editing is already underway on...