Skip to main content

Left, Right, or Straight: Leg Analysis #2

 Left, Right, or Straight: Leg Analysis #2

Routes analiysis of leg 9 of the norwegian M20 test race for JWOC 2017.

Sometimes we can make very wrong assumptions about the terrain's runnability based on the map alone. This is especially common in Scandinavian terrain.

An illustrative example of this is a 1050-meter leg where a 1750-meter route (extending it by 700 meters) proved to be the winning choice over other routes.

So, this leg 9 is from the 2017 M20 qualification race in Norway for the World Junior Championships.

link: https://www.tulospalvelu.fi/gps/20170528langH/



The "Straight" route, expertly executed by Audun Heimdal, measured approximately 1,200 meters and had a time of 9:18.



The best time on the right-side route was achieved by Eirik Langedal Breivik, who completed it in 8:30, which was 48 seconds faster than Heimdal's time. Notably, the length of Breivik's route was over 1,750 meters, making it 45% longer than the "straight" route chosen by Heimdal.

The average pace of the leader on the straight route was 7:42 minutes per kilometer, indicating very challenging running conditions in the forest. It is highly likely that there was dense and difficult-to-run undergrowth vegetation, a situation not uncommon in Norway.

We can also assess that the forest was challenging to navigate based on the choices made by athletes. Out of 20 participants with GPS devices, 14 opted for the right-side route, and 10 of them chose the shortest way to the path available, which involved going significantly to the right from Control 8. The option involving a straight route along the long re-entrant to the road lost a minimum of 30 seconds compared to the longer option.



Notably, even Kasper Fosser chose the shorter route to the path but lost almost one minute here, perhaps due to low runnability. 




The left-side route, which involved using paths, was not optimal due to its significant extension (almost 1700 meters). Additionally, there was considerably less running on the paths compared to the right-side route, and these paths were shallow, which didn't allow for the same speed as the road on the right-side route 



The running pace on the road was 4.36 min/km including the section beetwing two roads in the middle. The total pace on the right-hand route was  4.51 min/km


An important conclusion we can draw from the analysis of this run is that it is crucial to know the pace you can maintain in the 'open' forest and on the trails in a given area in order to make the best route choices. The difference between these two paces depends on the percentage of route lengthening that can be offset by a faster pace on the pathes or roads. 

November 1, 2023. Aleksndr Alekseyonok.

See also my brand New e-book on Orienteering for advanced runners 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Left, Right, or Straight: Leg Analysis #13

  Left, Right, or Straight: Leg Analysis #13 Today we will take a close look at the route choice for leg 5-6  from the women's elite long-distance  at the "Närkekvartetten" 3-day event in Sweden (May 11, 2024) The altitude gain on this leg will not have a significant effect on the route choice.  The right-hand route doesn't look bad in the first half, with a fairly large section along the road. However, after the stream (point A), there is difficult navigation with challenging runnability. Therefore, we will abandon this route and choose between the 'direct' and 'left' routes. The straight and left routes are identical up to the midpoint (point B). Therefore, we have ample time on the course to make a decision. Additionally, the alternative of running to point B on the right side of the road (orange track) is not favourable as it involves a longer path compared to the straight route to point B, where there is a long path. Let's look at the differe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Left, Right, or Straight: Leg Analysis #15

    Left, Right, or Straight: Leg Analysis #15 On the 31st of May, a long-distance race was held as part of the training camp for the Youth European Championships in Poland.  These courses offered the competitors many typical legs for this type of terrain.  One of them is the  leg 3-4 for M18, M16 (same leg 2-3 for D18, D16).  This leg offered a range of three classic route variations.  - the shortest, but with two 30 metre slopes. - the middle  with one slope. (+200 metres of distance) - longest with  0.5 slope. (+ 350 metres of distance). On the Livelox website, we can see only a few  GPS tracks of the competitors, and we do not know their strength or with what effort they ran this distance. But it can still be seen that, among equal-speed competitors, the straight route lost to the right by about 30 seconds on average. See the tracks of D 18 class The left one is about equal to or better than the right one. However, very little info...
Post a Comment
Read more

Left, Right, or Straight: Leg Analysis #18

    Left, Right, or Straight: Leg Analysis #18 Presented  leg 6-7 from the middle distance of the Norwegian Masters Championship 2024 (15.09. 2024; M65 class). Of the possible three routes, the left route goes over the hill and has almost the same lengthening as the right route (which has no climb).  So we're not considering left route for execution. On the direct route there is a very steep slope to climb up. It takes a lot of time.  See a comparison drawing of the best routes of straight and right. The right route turns out to be the fastest, while it is possible to see other legs ahead on the road. However, it is important to take the shortest route to the road from control 6.  See a comparison drawing of two right routes on this leg ( best time on the leg and the course leader who only had 7th time on this leg). See also all routes of M65 class on this leg  Source: https://www.livelox.com/Viewer/Veteranmesterskapet-mellom/H65-?classId=84...
1 comment
Read more