Skip to main content

Left, Right, or Straight: Leg Analysis #2

 Left, Right, or Straight: Leg Analysis #2

Routes analiysis of leg 9 of the norwegian M20 test race for JWOC 2017.

Sometimes we can make very wrong assumptions about the terrain's runnability based on the map alone. This is especially common in Scandinavian terrain.

An illustrative example of this is a 1050-meter leg where a 1750-meter route (extending it by 700 meters) proved to be the winning choice over other routes.

So, this leg 9 is from the 2017 M20 qualification race in Norway for the World Junior Championships.

link: https://www.tulospalvelu.fi/gps/20170528langH/



The "Straight" route, expertly executed by Audun Heimdal, measured approximately 1,200 meters and had a time of 9:18.



The best time on the right-side route was achieved by Eirik Langedal Breivik, who completed it in 8:30, which was 48 seconds faster than Heimdal's time. Notably, the length of Breivik's route was over 1,750 meters, making it 45% longer than the "straight" route chosen by Heimdal.

The average pace of the leader on the straight route was 7:42 minutes per kilometer, indicating very challenging running conditions in the forest. It is highly likely that there was dense and difficult-to-run undergrowth vegetation, a situation not uncommon in Norway.

We can also assess that the forest was challenging to navigate based on the choices made by athletes. Out of 20 participants with GPS devices, 14 opted for the right-side route, and 10 of them chose the shortest way to the path available, which involved going significantly to the right from Control 8. The option involving a straight route along the long re-entrant to the road lost a minimum of 30 seconds compared to the longer option.



Notably, even Kasper Fosser chose the shorter route to the path but lost almost one minute here, perhaps due to low runnability. 




The left-side route, which involved using paths, was not optimal due to its significant extension (almost 1700 meters). Additionally, there was considerably less running on the paths compared to the right-side route, and these paths were shallow, which didn't allow for the same speed as the road on the right-side route 



The running pace on the road was 4.36 min/km including the section beetwing two roads in the middle. The total pace on the right-hand route was  4.51 min/km


An important conclusion we can draw from the analysis of this run is that it is crucial to know the pace you can maintain in the 'open' forest and on the trails in a given area in order to make the best route choices. The difference between these two paces depends on the percentage of route lengthening that can be offset by a faster pace on the pathes or roads. 

November 1, 2023. Aleksndr Alekseyonok.

See also my brand New e-book on Orienteering for advanced runners 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

  Case Study #4 Case: You ran onto a narrow ride slightly below its end and are unsure which of several similar rides you are on.   Solution: In this situation, the relief profile can assist us. Even if the rides themselves appear similar, the relief profile along each ride differs , providing valuable clues for accurate positioning. This approach is discussed in Chapter 3 ( Using All the Indicators for Confident Positioning ) of the book Planning Reliable Routes . It demonstrates that relief can be used not only when we are uncertain about our current location , but also proactively during route planning . By analysing the map in advance, we can identify segments where linear features intersect with relief forms , creating distinct and easily recognisable points. These can serve as reliable positioning features . Additionally, flat areas and transitions between slopes and level terrain can also support effective location verification. (Example taken from my book Plann...
Post a Comment
Read more

Left, Right, or Straight: Leg Analysis #21

  Left, Right, or Straight: Leg Analysis #21 Today we will take a look at Leg 5–6 from the M18 Long Distance course at the   Novembertävlingarna, lång event (23.11.2025) Organising club Tullinge SK (Sweden) In the M18 class, the most successful route choices used a less distinct path running between the hills. In general, the approach to the control could be planned either contouring around the hillside or crossing over the top . This decision largely influenced the entire route choice on this leg. Interestingly, both of these approaches were used by the fastest runners on this leg (Carl-Meijer Axelsson and Jonathan Enarsson) — and both produced very similar results . The athlete who placed 3rd on this leg - Ivar Nordberg (and eventually 3rd overall ) most likely made a mistake. After reaching the top of the hill , he deviated down toward the open field — a move that doesn't seem justified. Most likely, he lost direction while descending the slope. This leg also ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Road to JWOC 2026, #2 (Long Distance)

  The Road to JWOC 2026, #2 (Long Distance) Short  Leg 1: what to do In the previous post in this series, we identified—based on the terrain characteristics and extensive experience from many previous competitions in this area—that a short first leg with complex navigation is highly likely. In this post, we focus on what exactly to do in such a situation. Let us begin by explaining why we are specifically discussing short first legs . If the first leg is longer , it will most likely intersect paths , as this terrain is full of paths of different types . In that case, an athlete has several safety options : – choosing a detour along paths; – or navigating less precisely on a bearing , deliberately aiming off early to hit a path and then restoring exact position while running along it. https://www.livelox.com/Viewer/JVM-test-lang/D20?classId=392774&live=false&tab=player In such scenarios, the initial nervousness and uncertainty at the beginning of the co...
Post a Comment
Read more