Skip to main content

Routes analysis of Leg 17 of the Euromeeting 2016 Long Women course

 

Leg 16-17 from the Long Women course of Euromeeting 2016. Latvia. 24.09.2016.

The Course and GPS routes are here

Let's start with a general assessment of the relief and relative heights of the control points. One way or another, we will have to descend to the level of the second thickened horizon from the control. Therefore, there is no difference: to run down slope at the beginning or at the end of the leg.



 

The length of the right route and the left route is about the same: approximately 1300 meters on the left side and 1400 on the right side.



But on the left, there are doubts about the good runnability of the section after the footpath. Also, the climb up the gully will be on a soft, boggy surface.

The difficulty of control 17 is that the re-entrant where the boulder is located is not obvious from below. Therefore, there is a risk of running and not noticing this re-entrant if you do not trace the thin, narrow spur in the gully.



Approaching Control 17 from the top of the slope (from the path) can also lead to an error if you do not fix the starting point of the bearing section well or if you do not perform the bearing-based run well.



Advantages of the rightside route: more running on the path; more opportunity to maintain the pace and choose routes on further legs.

The straight cut through the gully does not give a gain and even loses about 20 seconds, even though it is shorter by 200 metres. But descending 25 metres over a narrow marsh and climbing 25 metres is ultimately slower than running around a ravine on the right on the flat surface.



Taking the long way to the footpath on the left route did not give any time gain.



The course leaders run this leg mostly from the right side (including a strait cut through the gully). It is therefore difficult to judge how long they would have run the route on the left. Probably, the leg time would have been about the same.

However, from a tactical point of view, the right-side option had a greater advantage. That is why fewer athletes were running on the left.


October 30, 2023 Aleksandr Alekseyonok

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

  Case Study #4 Case: You ran onto a narrow ride slightly below its end and are unsure which of several similar rides you are on.   Solution: In this situation, the relief profile can assist us. Even if the rides themselves appear similar, the relief profile along each ride differs , providing valuable clues for accurate positioning. This approach is discussed in Chapter 3 ( Using All the Indicators for Confident Positioning ) of the book Planning Reliable Routes . It demonstrates that relief can be used not only when we are uncertain about our current location , but also proactively during route planning . By analysing the map in advance, we can identify segments where linear features intersect with relief forms , creating distinct and easily recognisable points. These can serve as reliable positioning features . Additionally, flat areas and transitions between slopes and level terrain can also support effective location verification. (Example taken from my book Plann...

Left, Right, or Straight: Leg Analysis #21

  Left, Right, or Straight: Leg Analysis #21 Today we will take a look at Leg 5–6 from the M18 Long Distance course at the   Novembertävlingarna, lång event (23.11.2025) Organising club Tullinge SK (Sweden) In the M18 class, the most successful route choices used a less distinct path running between the hills. In general, the approach to the control could be planned either contouring around the hillside or crossing over the top . This decision largely influenced the entire route choice on this leg. Interestingly, both of these approaches were used by the fastest runners on this leg (Carl-Meijer Axelsson and Jonathan Enarsson) — and both produced very similar results . The athlete who placed 3rd on this leg - Ivar Nordberg (and eventually 3rd overall ) most likely made a mistake. After reaching the top of the hill , he deviated down toward the open field — a move that doesn't seem justified. Most likely, he lost direction while descending the slope. This leg also ...

New o-book is coming this fall!

  New O-Book Coming This Fall! Confident Orienteering: A Systematic Approach to Minimising Errors Book 1: Fundamentals was released in October 2023 and has already been translated into seven languages , alongside the original English edition. With 8 chapters and 140 pages, it introduced the core concepts of the author's navigation system — and I’m still amazed at how warmly it was received by orienteers around the world. 🌍 As we continued working on the next part of this practical guide, it became clear that the project had grown into something much bigger — not least because of the sheer number of examples and illustrations included throughout (around 250 in total!). To make the material easier to absorb, we’re now leaning towards splitting it into two volumes , each with its own clear focus. This isn’t a final decision yet, and even the titles below are working titles — but right now, this structure feels like the most reader-friendly option: 📖 Book 2 (working title...