Skip to main content

One Year of "Confident Orienteering"

 One Year of "Confident Orienteering"

A few days ago marked one year since I released my first book on orienteering in digital format.

“Confident Orienteering: A Systematic Approach to Minimising Errors. Book 1: Fundamentals” dives into why mistakes happen in orienteering and provides strategies to avoid them. 

The upcoming Book 2—Routes Planning and Execution—will focus on putting these strategies into action in real-life scenarios. Though we initially aimed to release it in 2024, it will now be ready by mid-2025 at the earliest. Progress is steady, and the same great team from Book 1 is still with me. We’ve completed about 70% of the text, but we still have a lot of work on illustrations, with over 300 examples planned.

I’ll soon share a separate post about the amazing people contributing to this project, as well as one about Book 1 translations, highlighting the fantastic translators who made the book available in other languages.

For now, I have two updates to share:

  1. Quick Stats: Readers from 43 countries have purchased the book! It’s been translated and published in four languages so far: French, Ukrainian, Danish, and Polish. The French edition is the only one available in print, while the others remain digital. We are working on three more translations—Italian, Serbian, and Portuguese—and hope to release them by the end of winter.

  2. Most importantly, a huge thank you! Thank you to everyone who has bought and supported the book. Your trust means the world to me. Your reviews are incredibly valuable too. Some of you have said it’s the best book on orienteering you’ve ever read, which keeps our team motivated to make this project the best it can be.

If you’ve thought about leaving a review for Confident Orienteering, Book 1 but haven’t yet, I’d love to hear your feedback. I post all signed reviews in a shared Google folder, whether they’re fully positive or include constructive thoughts. You can email your review to me at aaliaksandr1357@gmail.com.

I’ve consolidated a preview version of the book, editor and reader reviews, and links to the original and translated editions in one shared folder here:

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1AJAdbUu6RhjfuOqjCs7unfclLTBmfgQ1?usp=drive_link

Sincerely, Aleksandr Alekseyonok, November 5, 2024.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Left, Right, or Straight: Leg Analysis #13

  Left, Right, or Straight: Leg Analysis #13 Today we will take a close look at the route choice for leg 5-6  from the women's elite long-distance  at the "Närkekvartetten" 3-day event in Sweden (May 11, 2024) The altitude gain on this leg will not have a significant effect on the route choice.  The right-hand route doesn't look bad in the first half, with a fairly large section along the road. However, after the stream (point A), there is difficult navigation with challenging runnability. Therefore, we will abandon this route and choose between the 'direct' and 'left' routes. The straight and left routes are identical up to the midpoint (point B). Therefore, we have ample time on the course to make a decision. Additionally, the alternative of running to point B on the right side of the road (orange track) is not favourable as it involves a longer path compared to the straight route to point B, where there is a long path. Let's look at the differe

Left, Right, or Straight #7

Left, Right, or Straight #7 When I saw leg 4-5, I thought, 'What a not very interesting long leg with an unambiguous route on the right side along the crest of the hill.' However, it turns out that's not actually the case. Many athletes didn't take advantage of this opportunity. Do you think there's an equally viable alternative to the route on the right? source: https://www.livelox.com/Viewer/Costa-Calida-2024-Larga-Caravaca-/M-35A?classId=716564&tab=player Expect a detailed analysis of this leg in a few days. Aleksandr Alekseyonok, March 3, 2024.

Left, Right, or Straight: Leg Analysis #9

  Left, Right, or Straight: Leg Analysis #9 Today, we will focus on a detailed analysis of leg 14-15 from the women's long course at 'Spring Spartacus' event in Hungary. I find the route choice for leg 14-15  to be simple and unambiguous.  This perception is supported by the GPS tracks of the competitors. Interestingly, only one competitor from this class took the right-hand route out of all those who loaded their tracks on Livelox. We cannot definitively attribute this deviation to the athlete's error. For many runners, these competitions were part of the training camp for the European Championships 2024. The athlete may have had different objectives than simply completing the course quickly. It's possible that on this leg, she was practicing a challenging technical skill, such as running along a slope. However, based on this iformation, we can assess how effective the right-hand route was.  The leg is 1060 metres long, crossing massive landforms. Therefore, one