Skip to main content

How Well Do You Know Orienteering Map Symbols?

 

How Well Do You Know Orienteering Map Symbols?

Test your knowledge with two challenging quizzes!



Reading an orienteering map is much more than recognising colours and familiar shapes. Every map symbol represents a particular terrain feature, and understanding its precise meaning is essential for confident navigation.

But how accurately do you interpret these symbols?

Can you distinguish a small depression from a pit? Do you know the differences between various types of paths, marshes, cliffs and vegetation? Can you interpret the information conveyed by a symbol without relying on its general appearance alone?

I have prepared two quizzes, each containing 10 questions, based on the International Specification for Orienteering Maps (ISOM 2017-2).

Quiz 1 — Intermediate: Know Your Map Symbols

Test your knowledge of commonly used map symbols, their correct names and what they represent in the terrain.

Quiz 2 — Advanced: Understand the Differences

Take on more challenging questions about similar symbols, their precise definitions, minimum dimensions, runnability and practical interpretation.

How it works

Each question has five possible answers, but only one is correct. Complete all 10 questions in a quiz and click Check My Answers to see your score, the correct answers and short explanations.

Your maximum score for each quiz is 10 points.

Even experienced orienteers may discover a few details worth revisiting!

Ready to challenge yourself?



These quizzes were prepared with the assistance of ChatGPT (OpenAI), based on the International Specification for Orienteering Maps (ISOM 2017-2).

Source: O-Map Wiki.

Want to Go Beyond Map Symbols?

These quizzes were prepared with the help of ChatGPT. AI can explain map symbols and test your knowledge, but it cannot replace real experience in the forest.

My books in the Confident Orienteering series are based on decades of practical experience, both my own and that of many other orienteers. They bring together real races, real mistakes, personal observations, and lessons learned through years of training and competition.

This is something AI cannot offer from its own experience.

If you want to go beyond recognising map symbols and learn how to navigate confidently, make better decisions, and minimise mistakes, explore my books:

Book 1: Fundamentals
Confident Orienteering: A Systematic Approach to Minimising Errors

Book 2: Planning Reliable Routes
Confident Orienteering: A Systematic Approach to Minimising Errors

AI can explain orienteering. Real experience teaches you how to do it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

  Case Study #4 Case: You ran onto a narrow ride slightly below its end and are unsure which of several similar rides you are on.   Solution: In this situation, the relief profile can assist us. Even if the rides themselves appear similar, the relief profile along each ride differs , providing valuable clues for accurate positioning. This approach is discussed in Chapter 3 ( Using All the Indicators for Confident Positioning ) of the book Planning Reliable Routes . It demonstrates that relief can be used not only when we are uncertain about our current location , but also proactively during route planning . By analysing the map in advance, we can identify segments where linear features intersect with relief forms , creating distinct and easily recognisable points. These can serve as reliable positioning features . Additionally, flat areas and transitions between slopes and level terrain can also support effective location verification. (Example taken from my book Plann...

The Road to JWOC 2026, #2 (Long Distance)

  The Road to JWOC 2026, #2 (Long Distance) Short  Leg 1: what to do In the previous post in this series, we identified—based on the terrain characteristics and extensive experience from many previous competitions in this area—that a short first leg with complex navigation is highly likely. In this post, we focus on what exactly to do in such a situation. Let us begin by explaining why we are specifically discussing short first legs . If the first leg is longer , it will most likely intersect paths , as this terrain is full of paths of different types . In that case, an athlete has several safety options : – choosing a detour along paths; – or navigating less precisely on a bearing , deliberately aiming off early to hit a path and then restoring exact position while running along it. https://www.livelox.com/Viewer/JVM-test-lang/D20?classId=392774&live=false&tab=player In such scenarios, the initial nervousness and uncertainty at the beginning of the co...

Left, Right, or Straight: Leg Analysis #21

  Left, Right, or Straight: Leg Analysis #21 Today we will take a look at Leg 5–6 from the M18 Long Distance course at the   Novembertävlingarna, lång event (23.11.2025) Organising club Tullinge SK (Sweden) In the M18 class, the most successful route choices used a less distinct path running between the hills. In general, the approach to the control could be planned either contouring around the hillside or crossing over the top . This decision largely influenced the entire route choice on this leg. Interestingly, both of these approaches were used by the fastest runners on this leg (Carl-Meijer Axelsson and Jonathan Enarsson) — and both produced very similar results . The athlete who placed 3rd on this leg - Ivar Nordberg (and eventually 3rd overall ) most likely made a mistake. After reaching the top of the hill , he deviated down toward the open field — a move that doesn't seem justified. Most likely, he lost direction while descending the slope. This leg also ...